<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Robots for Robots — NerdSEQ Portable tracker]]></title>
		<link>https://www.robotsforrobots.net/viewtopic.php?id=12538</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.robotsforrobots.net/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=12538&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in NerdSEQ Portable tracker.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:07:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: NerdSEQ Portable tracker]]></title>
			<link>https://www.robotsforrobots.net/viewtopic.php?pid=192446#p192446</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>score100 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>To me the new polyend tracker looks more capable and is portable enough. Haven&#039;t tried either though, so not a well grounded opinion&nbsp; <img src="https://www.robotsforrobots.net/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p></blockquote></div><p>The polyend looks sleek, but the nerdseq has better features imo and the guy developing it, is implementing a lot of user requests. Nerdseq has a 4 Note Polyphony per track, where as the polyend tracker only supports 1 Note per track. I chatted up the polyend guy and asked him to consider polyphony or at least chord fx for midi out, but he is not interested at all in adding this, since it&#039;s a tracker (?), which I found a slightly confusing stance.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (FrvrTrx)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.robotsforrobots.net/viewtopic.php?pid=192446#p192446</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: NerdSEQ Portable tracker]]></title>
			<link>https://www.robotsforrobots.net/viewtopic.php?pid=192434#p192434</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>the design of the Polyend it&#039;s cool, but i read the specs on the Xor are actually better</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (fantomas)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2020 17:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.robotsforrobots.net/viewtopic.php?pid=192434#p192434</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: NerdSEQ Portable tracker]]></title>
			<link>https://www.robotsforrobots.net/viewtopic.php?pid=192432#p192432</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>To me the new polyend tracker looks more capable and is portable enough. Haven&#039;t tried either though, so not a well grounded opinion&nbsp; <img src="https://www.robotsforrobots.net/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (score100)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.robotsforrobots.net/viewtopic.php?pid=192432#p192432</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[NerdSEQ Portable tracker]]></title>
			<link>https://www.robotsforrobots.net/viewtopic.php?pid=192428#p192428</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>XOR is releasing a standalone version of their NerdSEQ Eurorack Tracker.<br />Looks fantastic, really smart implementations, 8 Tracks of Midi Out (with 4 Note Polyphony per Track).</p><p>Almost the hardware sequencer of my dreams &lt;3</p><p><a href="https://xor-electronics.com/nerdseq-portable/">https://xor-electronics.com/nerdseq-portable/</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (FrvrTrx)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.robotsforrobots.net/viewtopic.php?pid=192428#p192428</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
