Streifen am Himmel

I had a discuss about "aerosol" with a friend of mine last year in summer. Interesting to see this now. thx for sharing.

und hier noch was zu Auflockerung:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRHA9W-zExQ[/youtube]

I really don't want to start a discussion, but maybe you should read this:

http://www.esowatch.com/ge/index.php?title=Chemtrails (german)
http://www.skepdic.com/chemtrails.html (english)

Mrs. Brigitta Zubers argumentation is so damn poor and unscientific.
Citing various famous people, about the topic truth, adds nothing to the topic chemtrails and is a classic conpirancy theory method.
But maybe my brain is already damaged by the chemtrails and fluorization of water, so that I'm under total control of the illuminati.
Maybe the illuminati control the above websites too? Just to misinform the people and keep them away from the "truth".
Who knows?
I'm out of this thread, feel free to rant.

Always the same: Most people turn everything into a joke. I dont know the so called Truth either, but I dont act like a braindead being.  Its everything a point of view ..... But if you accept only one view: Just go ahed! Feel free! Your answers and actions speak for itself. 

Thanx for your Links ... but wellknown already - without giving it an ironic taste. THATs the difference!

And for me there is no need to rant.  THIS is only in YOUR head ...

Mystery solved.

yeah, we can see how "open minded" you are, when someone has an argument against your claim. to call someone not open for arguments is no argument by itself - its a method every conspiracy theorist does. and the pluralism-argument is none too. if someone claims 3+3=6 theres no room for pluralism, the result is 6 and nothing else. its the same with physics.
the person in the vid dictates a method of thinking too, even befor she is "argumenting" and the presentation is full of tautologies and not arguments. another method of cospiracists is , the less evidence a claim has, the more one should belive there is a conspiracy behind it.

Yes Smackos, I know there is a lot of complete "bullshit" in this conspiracy world outthere. I totally share your opinion. Furthermore I know the official statements concerning the chemtrails. All these statements sounds traceable and lets say okay and tenable somehow. No problem. But can we trust them? Some will say Yes, and others will decide to say: No or some I dont know or I dont care. So there SHOULD be NO confusion BETWEEN the people because we dont know for sure, and thats the reason why I personally wrote its interesting. This doenst mean that I can shake hands with every single word she said. Definitely not.

The reason why I dont like the Skywatchers Vid is for sure not the Music (great), but the attitude to discredit people who try to understand something in a way which doesnt fit the norm. And yes its funny from a certain point of view, but it depends on the view ;-) 

3 + 3 = 6. Sure. But why you bring this when you really dont know the constants in the case of chemtrails? Yss, you can fit in with the official statements. No problem, BUT you cant be sure. So we only do wildcatting.   

I dont know if the Pilots know exactly what they carry or what they are doing all the time. Its a speculation. We dont know it for sure. So I am keen on in listening to peoples point of view. Ofcourse Mrs. Zubers brought poor arguments but for people who didnt noticed this kind of actions the last years its a good start to think a little bit about your environment and what is changing which doenst mean its bad, aganist the goverment or conspiracy.  Just to get informed .... and not only from one source ....